Risk rating
Information
Incident:
Information
Downgraded:
No

SCA CW [REDACTED] AND [REDACTED] MET WITH [REDACTED] WHO WAS ENGAGING WITH [REDACTED] CULTURAL ADVISOR AT THE TIME IN AREA 1.[REDACTED] HAD PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED TO MEET WITH CW’S.[REDACTED] INFORMED CW THROUGH LANGUAGE SUPPORT FROM [REDACTED] THAT SHE WOULD LIEK TO DIVORCE HER HUSBAND, [REDACTED] . CW [REDACTED] ASKED IN REGARDS TO WHETHER THERE HAD BEEN AN INCIDENT AND OR OTHER ISSUES THAT LED TO HER DECISION.[REDACTED] STATED TO CW’S THAT HER HUSBAND [REDACTED] HAD BEEN EXPOSING HERSELF TO OTHER WOMAN IN THE RPC3″. [REDACTED] STATED THAT OTHER WOMAN HAD ADVISED HER THAT [REDACTED] HAD “”PULLED DOWN HIS PANTS IN FRONT OF THEM””.[REDACTED] DID NOT PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE WOMEN INVOLVED. CW’S THEN DISCUSSED HER DECISION TO DIVORCE [REDACTED] AND ADVISED THAT THEY WILL FOLLOW THIS UP FURTHER WITH SCA MANAGERS .[REDACTED] REPORTED THAT CURRENTLY SHE WILL BE STAYING IN HER SISTER’S ACCOMMODATION.”””

0 artists registered for this file. If 3 or more artists have selected a file we encourage you to choose another.